Tag Implication: Naruko->Couple of things

Naruko->
1.Uzumaki_naruto
2.genderswap
3.sexy no jutsu

Reasons:
1. It's him
2. Female version of naruto
3. Name of the technique (and apparently it's used as a tag) used to obtain female state. Also, naruko wiki says, "The female form Naruto Uzumaki takes when he uses his Sexy Jutsu," so it would seem approiate to also give it this tag.

I know 1 doesn't really NEED it since they're already done, and 2 only have a few naruko tagged images without it, but 3 is missing from over half of them.
Over all, doing 1 and 2 will just prevent others from having to clean up messes other people leave or didn't tag.

Edit: Yes I know a couple =/= 3 XD

forum #20724, looks like gladwort forgot to go through with it though.

Log said:
forum #20724, looks like gladwort forgot to go through with it though.

Hm, I just assumed something like this would be common sense if already mentioned so I didn't bother searching first :3

Well, even with reason 1 out, #2 and #3 still seem vaild

I don't understand why we have the sexy no jutsu tag. It's not like midnight bliss where characters get different costumes or become super deformed.

Hillside_Moose said:
I don't understand why we have the sexy no jutsu tag. It's not like midnight bliss where characters get different costumes or become super deformed.

Because there's other characters in naruto, and they can(or could) use it as well. It's not limited to naruko
Well, I mean I didn't make the tag, you're not asking me why it's there, right? lol

Sexy no jutsu should be tied more to the transformation aspect than the genderswap aspect. If the image implies that the character has transformed (showing him transform or having the cloud-like things around) then I think it should receive the tag. If you just add it to all then it is nothing more than a redundant tag of genderswap unique to the Naruto franchise.

Going with what I said in the past thread, if a genderswap character takes on a life of their own then (such as by having a separate name from the original) I don't think there needs to be an implication to the original, just note it in the wiki.

NWF_Renim said:
Sexy no jutsu should be tied more to the transformation aspect than the genderswap aspect. If the image implies that the character has transformed (showing him transform or having the cloud-like things around) then I think it should receive the tag. If you just add it to all then it is nothing more than a redundant tag of genderswap unique to the Naruto franchise.

Going with what I said in the past thread, if a genderswap character takes on a life of their own then (such as by having a separate name from the original) I don't think there needs to be an implication to the original, just note it in the wiki.

Unfortunatly though, this is not what it's used as. Yes, it is a redundant genderswap unique to naruto franchise, exactly as you said.
Redundant as it is, it still needs implication OR removal. Sexy no jutsu alias to genderswap could be in order...

All Naruko pics should still absolutely be tagged with genderswap though, I've done this manually for now, but an implication will help for me or anyone else to have to do this again later.

Godel said:
All Naruko pics should still absolutely be tagged with genderswap though...

Hypothetically a character could cosplay as Naruko, in which case it should not be tagged genderswap.

evazion said: Hypothetically a character could cosplay as Naruko, in which case it should not be tagged genderswap.

Yeah, I was going to bring that up. That works against making genderswap an implication.

As for sexy_no_jutsu, uhhh, if we keep it I'd rather it be used in the way NWF_Remin described. As it is it's mostly redundant with naruko.

As for implicating the character himself, that's always been a murky area but if there's even one other genderswap well-known enough to get the Kyonko exemption, it's Naruko.