Tag Alias: nearly_naked_apron -> naked_apron

Aliasing nearly_naked_apron -> naked_apron.

Reason: It made sense at first, but then I read the wiki entries, and naked_apron covers nearly_naked_apron anyway.

Instead of aliasing them, consider changing the naked_apron wiki page to exclude underwear.

The two are probably worth distinguishing, but couldn't that tag become apron over underwear or something more descriptive/intuitive?

7HS said: The two are probably worth distinguishing, but couldn't that tag become apron over underwear or something more descriptive/intuitive?

This sounds reasonable to me. After all, if you're wearing just an apron then you're already in reality "nearly" naked.

I would rather get rid of nearly_naked_apron and just go with a panties naked_apron search, but I'm sure someone would object to that.

If we want to distinguish between the two, I suggest keeping nearly_naked_apron, since we should probably implicate the tag to naked_apron.

I'm actually in agreement with panties naked_apron. Establishing the new tag also means work, since someone will have to scour naked_apron to add it.

panties naked_apron (or underwear naked_apron) is what I was going to post as well.

Whoops, I actually considered that, but in a slip of the mind searched panties apron instead and noted it was conflated with apron-over-other-clothes pantyshots. Of course, the expanded definition of naked_apron has no such issue.

Don't see why nearly naked apron can't be disposed of entirely, then.

Hillside_Moose said:
I would rather get rid of nearly_naked_apron and just go with a panties naked_apron search, but I'm sure someone would object to that.

If we want to distinguish between the two, I suggest keeping nearly_naked_apron, since we should probably implicate the tag to naked_apron.

I don't necessarily object to it (it was actually my first thought as well), but that search pulls up images like post #357173, where the panties are there, but aren't worn, or images like post #48651, where the panties are being worn by another girl. These images are pretty few and far between, however, so take that as you will.

Hillside_Moose said: I would rather get rid of nearly_naked_apron and just go with a panties naked_apron search, but I'm sure someone would object to that.

Ah yes this sounds reasonable too.

So long as there is a way to distinguish the two I'd support it. Whatever is decided though should equally be applied to most of the other naked clothing tags imo, like naked_shirt. At least in the case of the shirt there should be a good number of images where the character is wearing only a shirt and underwear (in general girls using a dress shirt as sleepwear).

I like the "panties naked_apron" approach, but would like to suggest an alternative: "nearly_naked apron". "nearly_naked" would be a tag that indicates that the figure is wearing only a few articles of clothing, which would be identified by their own tags. So "naked_apron" would be replaced by "nearly_naked apron", while "nearly_naked_apron" would be replaced by "nearly_naked apron panties".

nearly naked is pretty subjective and/or would be like 1/4 of the site (thereby defeating the purpose of even bothering to tag.)

That's making things a lot more complicated than it should be. Not to mention normal members can't even pull off that search.

This doesn't seem to have been implemented yet, if it's going to be.

I'm not sure from this what we decided to implement. I guess people are in agreement that the alias is okay, but that we still need another way to handle nearly naked apron images that actually are nearly naked. And I think I'm still with moose on that one.