Wiki strangeness

I just attempted to edit out the no-longer-revelant touhou references from marisa, only to be thwarted completely. Turns out that you click edit, only the odd ":tags: tag" thing is left in the source (it's present in more pages, btw, any idea what it is?), and the text is nowhere to be found. WTF? I could just delete the page, and will eventually do so as empty bodies are apparently not allowed, but I prefer to find out the reason for that oddity before I do so.

*tries*

*blinks*

Now that is odd.

The edit link is wrong, http://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki/edit?title=marisa&version=2 works.
In http://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki/history?title=marisa both versions link to version 1 too... I guess wiki entries have a version field that isn't set properly for old entries.

Same thing happened to me. I just gave the page new content, so you don't have to delete it... However, for future reference this is what it looked like when I tried to edit:

http://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki/show?title=marisa

There was actual content on the page as Hazuki said, not just ":tags: tag".

Interesting fact, if I check the history there's three versions listed, but none show the original content... just ":tags: tag".

Ah, good to know.

Also, a fun fact: "who" and "whom" actually have very precise usage rules and are not at all random. "Mercenary who appears in ...", but "Mercenary whom I love dearly". "Whom" is used when the pronoun stands for an object, and "who" when it's the subject.

葉月 said:
Ah, good to know.

Also, a fun fact: "who" and "whom" actually have very precise usage rules and are not at all random. "Mercenary who appears in ...", but "Mercenary whom I love dearly". "Whom" is used when the pronoun stands for an object, and "who" when it's the subject.

Oops. Yeah I know that, I QC (fansubbing) as well as write fiction, so I sort of have to. However I'm not at home and only poke around Danbooru when I have the time. I guess I wasn't paying much attention. I'm sure you didn't need an excuse but for me that's somewhat embarrassing.

Thanks for pointing it out and fixing it, though.

Back on topic. Has anyone figured out why the wiki article was acting that way? I'm going to guess it just happened between all the software updates and what not. I'm willing to bet it has happened before and simply wasn't mentioned on the forums.