Danbooru

[REJECTED] [Fate] Update Medusa tags

Posted under Tags

G-SANtos

remove implication medusa_(lancer)_(fate) -> rider
remove implication gorgon_(fate) -> rider
create alias rider -> medusa_(fate)
create implication medusa_(fate) -> medusa_(fate)_(all)
create implication medusa_(lancer)_(fate) -> medusa_(fate)_(all)
create implication medusa_(lancer_alter)_(fate) -> medusa_(fate)_(all)
create implication gorgon_(fate) -> medusa_(fate)_(all)

mass update rider_(cosplay) -> medusa_(fate)_(cosplay)

Link to request

Continuing with retagging project from topic #13728, this time with Medusa's variants. This request was previously on page 4 of that thread, but I'm now moving it here.

Updated by DanbooruBot

Reply
MyrMindservant

There are strong arguments against this change and there are users opposed to it, see topic #13728.

Rider's true name is a spoiler. Many users, including admins, were opposed to using true names for fate/stay night characters.

Catch all tag is not necessary because it can be fully replaced by a ~rider ~medusa_(lancer)_(fate) ~gorgon_(fate) ~medusa_(lancer_alter)_(fate) search.

Removing medusa_(lancer)_(fate) and gorgon_(fate) implications is fine, though.

Reply
KyteM

MyrMindservant said:

There are strong arguments against this change and there are users opposed to it, see topic #13728.

Rider's true name is a spoiler. Many users, including admins, were opposed to using true names for fate/stay night characters.

Catch all tag is not necessary because it can be fully replaced by a ~rider ~medusa_(lancer)_(fate) ~gorgon_(fate) ~medusa_(lancer_alter)_(fate) search.

Removing medusa_(lancer)_(fate) and gorgon_(fate) implications is fine, though.

You're saying it's fine because it can be replaced by a search using four tags? Are you for real?

Reply
1