[APPROVED] [Bulk] Aircraft implications

create implication airship -> aircraft
create implication hot_air_balloon -> aircraft
create implication glider -> aircraft
create implication autogyro -> aircraft
create implication tiltrotor -> aircraft

Link to request

They're mentioned in the aircraft page, and link to it, but unlike the other similar cases they don't have an implication to it.

Regarding hot air balloons, in case there's any doubt, even their wikipedia page defines them as aircrafts.

The bulk update request #1308 has been approved.

Do we consider gliders like this really as aircrafts?
post # 2762134

Or is this no glider? Paper airplane obviously doesn't fit.

Chiera said:

Do we consider gliders like this really as aircrafts?
post # 2762134

Or is this no glider? Paper airplane obviously doesn't fit.

Gliders are aircrafts. I think that post should be tagged with toy_airplane, as it looks more like it's made of cardboard rather than paper.

nonamethanks said:

Gliders are aircrafts.

This was more about the post (of course I'm aware that gliders are aircrafts).

But I think with toy airplane, I think this problem is solved.

+1 agree to all of the above implications.

A perfectly reasonable set of implications. For completeness, I'd suggest adding autogyro and tiltrotor to the request as well.

iridescent_slime said:

A perfectly reasonable set of implications. For completeness, I'd suggest adding autogyro and tiltrotor to the request as well.

Good catch, added.

The bulk update request #1308 has been approved.