[APPROVED] Tag implication: blindfold_slip -> blindfold

create implication blindfold_slip -> blindfold

Link to implication

Looks like a subset.

The tag implication blindfold_slip -> blindfold has been approved.

Makes sense, if there's blindfold slipping, obviously there's blindfold. +1

Is there anything that could be used as a blindfold, and slip, that blindfold_slip would cover, but would not qualify as a blindfold?

For example, the blindfold wiki directs users to tag sleeping mask for the blindfolds used to sleep. Sleeping mask's wiki calls it a type of blindfold, but there's no implication...so if we're keeping these tags separate (should we?), and a sleeping mask were to slip, would it be appropriate to tag it with blindfold_slip, or a different tag?

I wouldn't get sleep_mask mixed up with blindfold_pull. That just invites confusion. Maybe slippage could be tagged with mask_pull, I dunno.

Either way, seems like there's no conflicting tags, so going ahead with it.

The tag implication blindfold_slip -> blindfold has been approved.