[REJECTED] Tag implication: collaboration_request -> collaboration

create implication collaboration_request -> collaboration

Link to implication

EDIT: The tag implication collaboration_request -> collaboration has been rejected by @Type-kun.

So is a collaboration request where it's known that the image is a collaboration, but it's unknown who one or more of the contributing artists are...?

If it is the above, would it also make sense to have collaboration request also imply artist request...?

I think the tag may also be used in cases where the tagger sees strong evidence, be it stylistic or some contextual information from the description, that it's a collab but isn't certain.

From the name of the tag, I assumed it was for e.g. an artist drawing line art and requesting someone else to color it. There's a pixiv tag for that which I can't remember at the moment but it would translate to something like "collaboration request".

Whatever it really means, collaboration_request needs a wiki page.

☆♪ said:

From the name of the tag, I assumed it was for e.g. an artist drawing line art and requesting someone else to color it. There's a pixiv tag for that which I can't remember at the moment but it would translate to something like "collaboration request".

Whatever it really means, collaboration_request needs a wiki page.

Should we change it to collaboration_artist_request then?

Kikimaru said:

Should we change it to collaboration_artist_request then?

Sounds reasonable enough, if a little clunky. It's definitely clear what it means that way - it basically is an artist_request, just a different name so it doesn't look redundant if there's already an artist tag there.

The tag implication collaboration_request -> collaboration has been rejected by @Type-kun.