Posted under Tags
create implication short_over_long_sleeves -> layered_clothing
Submitting this implication, unless I'm missing something and have been tagging these wrong...?
EDIT: This tag implication has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.
EDIT: The tag implication short_over_long_sleeves -> layered_clothing has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
Updated by DanbooruBot
-1
imply short_over_long_sleeves -> layered_sleeves
imply layered_sleeves -> layered_clothing
if we take this approach
The other one would be to alias this and then +1
layered_sleeves -> short_over_long_sleeves (but then we are missing posts where long sleeves are over long sleeves. I'm more against this approach
But I'm also concerned about another thing: Shouldn't this tag be used (i.e. layered_clothing) if there is only ONE piece of garment? Because then most images would fail this implication.
Looking through {layered_sleeves}, it seems like many of them could be moved over to short over long sleeves. As for the rest, there would be no benefit IMO to combining them together with an implication, as it would only serve to water down the layered_sleeves tag.
Also noticed that there were some improperly tagged posts, such as post #2231724. The different layers are different clothing items (one is a jacket, the other is a sweater), and so they shouldn't be counted as a layered item IMO. It's similar to how the end of the sleeves of a dress shirt poking out from underneath a business suit don't count either (post #2556088).
I'm not sure whether this should be considered layered clothes when it comes to tagging, since it seems to occur way more often than the rest of layered clothes. Also layered_sleeves definitely needs a wiki.
The tag implication short_over_long_sleeves -> layered_clothing has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
