Danbooru

Read the rules before proceeding!

Topic: Flag Vandalism

Posted under General

Mikaeri

provence said:

Don't know what you mean. The post is already 7 days old, so it should not be pending anymore.
But yes, it used to be possible, some users received feedback for flagging pending posts. If it is still possible, then it should be changed.

Oh, derp, forget it. Forgot it was in the red queue for a second, I'm like half-asleep right now.

Well, anyways, whoever did that should probably receive a reprimand.

  • ID: 131288
  • Permalink
  • evazion

    IIRC it has always been possible for anyone to flag pending posts. IMO it should be disallowed.

  • ID: 131289
  • Permalink
  • user 509825

    evazion said:

    IIRC it has always been possible for anyone to flag pending posts. IMO it should be disallowed.

    Completely agree on that.
    The question is: Why was it possible in the first place or was it just overlooked?

  • ID: 131290
  • Permalink
  • evazion

    It looks like it was fixed in issue #1327, but reverted because it prevented the system from creating "Unapproved in the three days" flags on pending posts. I think this could be avoided now though, now that we're using DanbooruBot for system-generated flags.

  • ID: 131291
  • Permalink
  • Chiera

    post #2835099
    Only in case such flags should come up in the future from the person that flagged it...the flag reasons stated are completely invalid.

  • ID: 135109
  • Permalink
  • Chiera

    post #2777312
    The scan artifact clause excludes posts that were originally uploaded by the artist. And this was uploaded by the artist to Twitter.
    Seems wrong to delete Twitter images for reasons like that and it happened twice on that post already.

  • ID: 136048
  • Permalink
  • Mikaeri

    Chiera said:

    post #2777312
    The scan artifact clause excludes posts that were originally uploaded by the artist. And this was uploaded by the artist to Twitter.
    Seems wrong to delete Twitter images for reasons like that and it happened twice on that post already.

    jpeg artifacts, but yes.

  • ID: 136065
  • Permalink
  • Chiera

    Mikaeri said:

    jpeg artifacts, but yes.

    Uff.
    Thanks for correcting.

    I've edited the jpeg artifact wiki a bit, to reflect the above fact.

  • ID: 136069
  • Permalink