Danbooru

Wiki Requests

Posted under General

knees touching

According to its wiki, it's knees_together_feet_apart standing, in which case it doesn't need to be a tag IMO. In actual usage it appears to be used for both knees_together_feet_apart (whether standing or not) and legs_together, and a couple where it's hard to tell or neither quite fit (such as post #2745815, knees and toes together but heels apart).

What do we do with this tag? If we're going to keep it, the wiki needs changing and maybe some other tags should imply it.

I've been editing some Re:Creators-related wiki pages but since there are spoiler tags here and there can someone please check them if they are still consistent with our anti-spoiler policy, since I know nothing about the copyright (and yes I spoiled myself in the process). thanks in advance

Chiera said:

What exactly is the difference between plump and curvy? Are they mutually exclusive, because I'm struggling between the tags on post #2919104. Used curvy for now, though.

Plump indicates fat whereas curvy does not. Also curvy indicates having the right curves, whereas plump does not. That post you indicated was more plump and much less curvy, so I switched out the tags.

BrokenEagle98 said:

Plump indicates fat whereas curvy does not. Also curvy indicates having the right curves, whereas plump does not. That post you indicated was more plump and much less curvy, so I switched out the tags.

Actually, that's a pretty meh explanation.
To me, it doesn'T seem that she was fat/plump in any way, but more "exaggerated" and therefore curvy.
I feel like this two tags have a very thin (:3) seperation line and think they should be made more clear.

Chiera said:

Actually, that's a pretty meh explanation.
To me, it doesn'T seem that she was fat/plump in any way, but more "exaggerated" and therefore curvy.
I feel like this two tags have a very thin (:3) seperation line and think they should be made more clear.

Curvy == big breasts, tiny waist, and a huge butt, but they need to be properly proportioned and streamlined. It can't get clearer than that, since what makes curves pleasing is mostly hard-wiring built into humans and can't really be expressed in words.

The following are great examples what I would consider curvy: post #2919299, post #2914132, post #2908016, post #2896142

If its something you don't understand, then its something you shouldn't tag. There a bunch of tags involving art composition that I don't tag because I don't get them, but I don't begrudge those that do from tagging them.

Is anyone willing to clear up whatever makes humanoid robot different from android? I'd like to clean up the former tag as many of its posts (post #2250641, post #2492452, post #2596550, post #2659083, post #2663447) are indistinguishable from ordinary androids, but it would help to have some agreement about what makes this tag a distinct concept.

Relatedly, is there any value to maintaining copyright-specific android tags like omnic and replicant?

iridescent_slime said:

Is anyone willing to clear up whatever makes humanoid robot different from android? I'd like to clean up the former tag as many of its posts (post #2250641, post #2492452, post #2596550, post #2659083, post #2663447) are indistinguishable from ordinary androids, but it would help to have some agreement about what makes this tag a distinct concept.

To myself, the following is how I would liken that relationship.

androids are to humanoid robots
as
humans are to humanoids

Relatedly, is there any value to maintaining copyright-specific android tags like omnic and replicant?

Not unless there's a reason why COPYRIGHT + android can't be used to find those pictures.

iridescent_slime said:

Is anyone willing to clear up whatever makes humanoid robot different from android? I'd like to clean up the former tag as many of its posts (post #2250641, post #2492452, post #2596550, post #2659083, post #2663447) are indistinguishable from ordinary androids, but it would help to have some agreement about what makes this tag a distinct concept.

Relatedly, is there any value to maintaining copyright-specific android tags like omnic and replicant?

Extrapolating from the android wiki, a humanoid robot would be a human shaped and human sized robot that is not made to look very human. Zinjata would be a humanoid robot given his(their?) lack of a human like face. Small sized transformers would also be humanoid robots, assuming they have a humanoid form. I would not object to any of the posts you mentioned being moved to android. Although post #2250641 doesnt seem to have anything distinguishing it as a robot at all.

Could we merge the tags? Probably. There are only a few posts like post #1803343 which does not fit under a broad definition of android or mecha.

We do have tags for desepticon and maximal so omnic does seem logical to keep.

1 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 52