Tag implication: swim_trunks -> swimsuit

"male swimwear"?

No one calls it that.

Ok, a language thing this time. Then I won't nag here any further :3.

Gollgagh said:

"male swimwear"?

No one calls it that.

No one calls male_pubic_hair either :3.

remove implication swim_briefs -> swimsuit

Link to request

I tried that already. NWF Renim rejected it.

tapnek said:

I tried that already. NWF Renim rejected it.

Look at the last post of the last page :3.

Markgraf said:

remove implication swim_trunks -> swimsuit

Link to request

Perhaps you meant swim_briefs -> swimsuit? Swim trunks currently does not implicate swimsuit.

NWF_Renim said:

Perhaps you meant swim_briefs -> swimsuit? Swim trunks currently does not implicate swimsuit.

Now it fits :3.

The bulk update request #685 has been approved.

The bulk update request #684 has been approved.

So, will someone have to manually remove "swimsuit" from all the male swimwear pics now?

90sAnimeFan said:

So, will someone have to manually remove "swimsuit" from all the male swimwear pics now?

Ugg, you're right ;_;
Btw. since the implication-chain is now nearly done:
Shouldn't swimsuit (or better swimsuit = female swimwear) imply swimwear, too?

So, it should be done now.

Umbrella tags are useful when there are posts that aren't covered by one of the more specific tags, or for cases when it's hard to tell which specific tag should be used.
In this case we already have two catch-all tags that cover everything and swimwear can be completely replaced by the ~swimsuit ~male_swimwear search. It would just add clutter without serving any real purpose.

So my suggestion is: remove the implication leading to swimwear and nuke the tag.

MyrMindservant said:

Umbrella tags are useful when there are posts that aren't covered by one of the more specific tags, or for cases when it's hard to tell which specific tag should be used.
In this case we already have two catch-all tags that cover everything and swimwear can be completely replaced by the ~swimsuit ~male_swimwear search. It would just add clutter without serving any real purpose.

So my suggestion is: remove the implication leading to swimwear and nuke the tag.

No clutter. The purpose is less tags used when searching. You would still search with two tags. That could be reduced to one if you want to search after general swimwear tags. It also doesn't destroy anything, since it it the general. So it doesn't get really in the way if one searches for bikini only, since other swimming attire are most of the time present.
So, 2 tags in one (-> one free slot to search) and doesn't hurt.

Wouldn't it be logical that one-piece swimsuits and bikinis now implicate swimwear as well? And get rid of the swimsuit tag?

90sAnimeFan said:

Wouldn't it be logical that one-piece swimsuits and bikinis now implicate swimwear as well? And get rid of the swimsuit tag?

Not really, there needs to be separate tags for male and female swimwear, as there is heavy overlap in depictions (ie male characters depicted with female characters, over 50% of images with males also depict females). It means any negative search using a -male_swimwear tag will purge a larger number of female swimsuit images from results, and vice-versa.

*edit: moved to topic #12740

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1471 (forum #142792) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.