Tag implication: dark_areolae -> areolae

create implication dark_areolae -> areolae

Link to implication

Same reason why dark_nipples imply nipples.

I'm wondering if there are posts in this database that have girls with nipples that are dark and areolae that are light. From how I see it, dark nipples usually come with dark areolae, right?

tapnek said:

I'm wondering if there are posts in this database that have girls with nipples that are dark and areolae that are light. From how I see it, dark nipples usually come with dark areolae, right?

Yes. But I think that this implication goes more with areolae_slip like in post #2332322.

The tag implication dark_areolae -> areolae has been approved.

create implication dark_nipples -> dark_areolae

Link to request

Can't have the former without the latter.

See search: dark_areolae -dark_nipples

*edit*
@Provence flipped the order

Kikimaru said:

create implication dark_areolae -> dark_nipples

Link to request

Can't have the former without the latter.

See search: dark_areolae -dark_nipples

This implication would make more sense the other way round.
For example, on post #2929526 you only see the areolae. Basically every post under areolae_slip dark_areolae should fall under this.

Provence said:

This implication would make more sense the other way round.
For example, on post #2929526 you only see the areolae. Basically every post under areolae_slip dark_areolae should fall under this.

dark areolae is supposed to only be used on images like post #2929526. So -1 to both ways around.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #1471 (forum #142792) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.