Danbooru

Read the rules before proceeding!

Topic: Tag implication: nail_polish -> fingernails

Posted under Tags

Pianist

iridescent_slime said:

The nail polish tag can be used for the product itself, not just the results of applying it.

nail polish bottle is also a separate tag...

It frequently gets used alongside toenail polish as well, whether fingernails are visible in the image or not. Nothing in the wiki definition precludes this usage.

...though I was wondering about this. In this case, what about a fingernail polish tag? Both it and toenail polish would imply nail polish, and also their respective kinds of nails.

...maybe this is a lot of trouble for an often-overlooked detail, but it's one that I pay attention to quite a bit, and a nail_polish -fingernails search returns the majority of the posts that nail_polish does.

  • ID: 109400
  • Permalink
  • albert

    The tag implication nail_polish -> fingernails has been rejected.

  • ID: 109491
  • Permalink
  • OOZ662

    I'd like to have this subset of tags looked at again. Just a brainspew list following. Whether anyone else actually cares is also in question.

    • toenails has 1,000 fewer posts than toenail_polish. Should probably be implicated.
    • nail_polish is "Lacquer that is applied to the nails of either the fingers or the toes" but we have a toenail_polish tag. I'd really rather see them either...
      • both combined into the one nail_polish tag
      • split into finger- and toe- varieties (send care packages for my eyes and left mouse button if this gets done)
        • If so, should implicate fingernail_polish -> fingernails
        • with or without nail_polish continuing to exist which instead refers to having one or both present; done via implication
  • ID: 120815
  • Permalink
  • chinatsu

    OOZ662 said:

    I'd like to have this subset of tags looked at again. Just a brainspew list following. Whether anyone else actually cares is also in question.

    • toenails has 1,000 fewer posts than toenail_polish. Should probably be implicated.
    • nail_polish is "Lacquer that is applied to the nails of either the fingers or the toes" but we have a toenail_polish tag. I'd really rather see them either...
      • both combined into the one nail_polish tag
      • split into finger- and toe- varieties (send care packages for my eyes and left mouse button if this gets done)
        • If so, should implicate fingernail_polish -> fingernails
        • with or without nail_polish continuing to exist which instead refers to having one or both present; done via implication

    Could we move forward with implementing one of these options? I've been going through my *nails* related posts and the fact that toenail_polish exists but fingernail_polish doesn't has been grinding at my gears. Either both should exist or neither.

  • ID: 126422
  • Permalink
  • EB

    I don't think toenail polish should imply toenails as there are plenty of images where the polish can be seen but the actual toenails are rather indistinct.

  • ID: 126443
  • Permalink
  • <<
  • 1
  • >>