Implicating cat_pose -> pose.

Reason: A type of pose.

I don't feel really comfortable with the 500 current pose posts being flooded with 600 more cat_pose posts.

Dunno if it's a valuable reason to make exceptions though.

Cyberia-Mix said: Dunno if it's a valuable reason to make exceptions though.

It's a valid concern, and I have felt the same way in the past. Sometimes a useful broad tag is completely overrun by one narrower concept within it, eclipsing all the other similar concepts.

At the same time, well, the implication is logically sound. So I'll probably do it... but I'll wait a bit first and see what others say.

I kind of agree with Cyberia-Mix. The tags seem to be used for rather different purposes right now, and I kind of agree how it's done. If you search pose cat_ears currently for instance, there's only a little more than half a page, and only a few of them would even be considered a "cat_pose" Cat pose is often just a simple hand gesture to go along with other cat features like ears and a tail. Pose tends to be something more noticeable with the character attempting to look cool, sexy, silly, etc., not just adding to a cat set-up.

Yeah I can accept the idea of pose being more of a full body positioning. Its uses so far are fairly consistent with that.

Just tag cat_pose manually where applicable then.

So a "See Also" for both wikis?

Also: pose <-> posing

Again, the gerund doesn't feel right, as it was with kiss.

+1 posing → pose, as with kiss,smile, and grin these sound better as noun-based "states" than gerund-based "actions" to me.

Posing seems to me to imply someone posing for an in-setting picture or painting. Not just putting up a pose for the benefit of the viewer.