close
Deletion appeal thread (restarted)

Previous thread: forum #9703

Same deal as the other thread, deletion appeals should only be posted here so they don't fill up the main thread listing. Only appeal things you have really, really good reason to. Frivolous appeals will only make things harder for you.

Thanks.

EDIT: READ THESE RULES BEFORE POSTING (also available at about:deletion_appeals):

1) Read about:mod_queue. Then read it again.

2) Use the post #xxxxx syntax to link to your images, using the ID number of the image. You can find this in the URL, as well as under "Statistics" on the left side menu on each image page.

3) You "appeal" an image, we "approve" them. If it's good. Do not ask us to "appeal" your images. You've already done that by mentioning them in the thread.

4) Never appeal a post twice. Multiple mods saw it the first time you did. They also saw it when it was first uploaded. It got its fair shot.

5) Never appeal all your deleted posts at once. Only appeal the absolute best. If all or most of your uploads have been deleted, you need to lurk more and get a better idea of what is acceptable.

6) Never expect or demand feedback or justification. You may get some, if anyone feels like providing it or has anything specific to say. However there are too many appeals and too many other things for us to do for us to have time to critique every appeal.

7) You may appeal images you did not upload.

8) Don't be an ass. Seriously. You'll just get banned. No, being polite doesn't make your image any better, but being rude does you no favors either. And if it does get you banned, appeals will be your last concern.

The deletion appeal thread is a place to bring up images you think deserve a second chance. Nothing more, nothing less.

--------------------------------
UPDATE Sept 5 2009

Reminder on how to use this thread (see also the first post).

Paraphrased from forum #25998, regarding deletion of unneeded posts from this thread: Extraneous chatter in this thread is likely to be deleted, and in the worst cases, negative records will be left for those who ignore the rules.

The lengthiest discussion that should generally be allowed about a single appeal is:

1) Uploader lists a few appeals (always)
2) A mod explains the reasons for deletion (occasionally)
3) User replies only if the deletion/explanation was based on factually incorrect information; i.e., it was not a nude filter and here's the link on the artist's website for proof. (rarely)

End. Anything beyond that is almost never going to be needed. Maybe an "oh you're right, undeleted" if applicable. Almost everything else can be removed.

For the most part, there's no need to go beyond step 1. Uploader appeals it, we look at it, and either it gets undeleted or it doesn't. Uploaders who pursue beyond this point are generally the ones uploading terrible images or not reading the rules anyway.

I also want janitors and mods to be more polite in response to appeals. Yes, an image may be shit. But we don't necessarily have to say that. I've often thought it, but I try to let the fact that I didn't approve their appeal speak for me. Some people only really get set off if they receive an unnecessarily blunt reply.

Unfortunately, some people won't "get it" unless you're really blunt, but hopefully they can be dealt with in ways that keep appeal thread clutter to a minimum.

post #353841 undeleted.
Also, why aren't the resize and similar options available on deleted posts?

FeKa said:
Also, why aren't the resize and similar options available on deleted posts?

When deleted images actually had their data deleted, there was no data to make a similarity check. Now that the data stays on the server this is no longer true however and the link could be added again.

Could post #354596 be considered undeletion? Comparing this post to the other four I uploaded earlier, I can't see anything that would cause it to go unapproved.

reese said:
Could post #354596 be considered undeletion? Comparing this post to the other four I uploaded earlier, I can't see anything that would cause it to go unapproved.

Only thing I can see that's iffy about it is the jpeg artifacts.

I agree, just the JPG artifacts which are probably unavoidable, and I like it otherwise. Undeleted.

piespy said:
When deleted images actually had their data deleted, there was no data to make a similarity check. Now that the data stays on the server this is no longer true however and the link could be added again.

I see. But what about the resize option then?

rehcaerp said:
post #354021
post #354023
post #354027
post #354032
post #354031
post #354028
post #354029

Please reconsider deletion, thanks.

Instead of appealing for these, why don't you try to raise your quality standar and upload better things?

Elfenus said:
Instead of appealing for these, why don't you try to raise your quality standar and upload better things?

Please refrain for making comments that can start a shitstorm again.
If you want to bitch about his uploads, send him a PM or something.

FeKa said:
Please refrain for making comments that can start a shitstorm again.

Ok. Sorry about that U_U.
I Complety forgot PM (heat of the moment).

What's wrong about the quality?

Where did I mention that already???

rehcaerp said:
What's wrong about the quality?

Awful artifacting and sub-par art. They look like ancient game CGs.

post #355213
post #355214
post #354840
post #354836
post #352324
post #355522

Last two I took some time wondering if I should bring them up, and went with yes. For me, they're gray area.

The only one of those worth anything was Laughing Octopus, and it had already been undeleted. Rest are crap.

Bleach said:
I'd like this one reconsidered:
post #349955

Now that you remind me of this.
What is the policy about figurines pics?

I was assuming that the policy was that as long as the figure itself provides a cute/interesting picture it's good enough.

I think so too, but I prefer to hear the opinion of the rest before doing anything.
If they're okay with figurines pics, I'll approve it.

I think "interesting" is more important than "cute" here, when it comes to figures. Same goes for pretty much any photo. I don't find this figure interesting enough to approve, but if FeKa does, go for it, I suppose.

I liked it, so undeleted.

I don't approve photos, figure or cosplay or otherwise. I don't approve real porn because it's out of scope, but figures and cosplay are personal preference (or lack thereof for them). Danbooru just doesn't seem like a place for photography for me, but I don't really have much of a problem with figures I guess. And cosplay/figures arent explicitly against the rules.

post #354798 - just tried to upload this and found it's already here but it expired. I can't quite see why unless people just hate the idea of Nagi with boobs... it collected quite a few favorites too.

piespy said:
post #354798 - just tried to upload this and found it's already here but it expired. I can't quite see why unless people just hate the idea of Nagi with boobs... it collected quite a few favorites too.

While the breasts are a bit of a blasphemy the only main problem was the skin coloring seemed a bit weird. It's not that bad though so I undeleted it.

piespy said:
I can't quite see why unless people just hate the idea of Nagi with boobs...

Yes. This is one of the things that should result in prompt and unrelenting beating with sticks.

piespy said:
post #354798 - just tried to upload this and found it's already here but it expired. I can't quite see why unless people just hate the idea of Nagi with boobs... it collected quite a few favorites too.

The art is just not so good, and the coloring is awful. I wouldn't have approved that picture.

What is it about post #360257 and post #360259 that made them worth keeping when post #360256 and post #360253 weren't? I'm not being sarcastic, I genuinely want to know because they seem equivalent at a glance. It's not an appeal per se because I don't care if they come back or not, my reason for asking is that hopefully knowing the reasoning behind it will help me in the future.

Also, for the scope of this topic, post #360045 and post #360054 .

salarta said:
What is it about post #360257 and post #360259 that made them worth keeping when post #360256 and post #360253 weren't?

For one, the unapproved ones look like cropped versions of bigger pictures.

Kayako said:
For one, the unapproved ones look like cropped versions of bigger pictures.

If they are, then the artist never added the uncropped versions to their site. I found all four images in the same area and same time frame. They're the same sizes only the width and height are reversed, literally the exact same numbers (270 x 400 for Ritsuko, 400 x 270 for Misato).