Danbooru

Comments

Blacklisted:
[hidden]

AngelxDemonChaos said:

Someone is missing

That all depends on whether or not Sayu Sincronisity either:
a. had enough time to develop any meaningful relationship with them in that agency,
b. alienated them through her antics during that brief time in that agency, or
c. Sayu (or all depicted) wants to keep their distance, whether on their own initiative or maybe part of the severance terms from that agency.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    I mean tbh it's even questionable if any of them outside of U-san will be willing to openly interact with Doki, even if they do have some real friendship going on behind the scene.

    Exactly because Mint, Matara and Kuro are at least still on good terms with their genmates in Niji whose bridge with Doki have certainly been burnt at this point, they might not want to show themselves "picking a side" in public, so to say. Similar to how Obsydia and some others still in Niji are presumably still on good terms with Doki herself, but can't openly just say they support her.

    U-san was probably okay because they were already cut off of the rest of Noctyx the moment they left.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    azurelorochi said:

    I mean tbh it's even questionable if any of them outside of U-san will be willing to openly interact with Doki, even if they do have some real friendship going on behind the scene.

    Exactly because Mint, Matara and Kuro are at least still on good terms with their genmates in Niji whose bridge with Doki have certainly been burnt at this point, they might not want to show themselves "picking a side" in public, so to say. Similar to how Obsydia and some others still in Niji are presumably still on good terms with Doki herself, but can't openly just say they support her.

    U-san was probably okay because they were already cut off of the rest of Noctyx the moment they left.

    What about Michi though?

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    KingsleyDawson said:

    What about Michi though?

    She definitely has some ill feelings (no pun intended) to her former agency over them cheating her of her tax liabilities but also note that she collab'd on Twitch with a certain songbird accused of being part of that "clique", meaning she's also at least on amicable terms with her despite the situation. In which case, it may be hard for her to openly collab with Doki anytime soon.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    blindVigil said:

    Like how Danbooru uses original, on Pixiv it's supposed to be any work that doesn't take any elements from existing copyrights.

    This is false. It has nothing to do with copyrights on Pixiv:

    "Original (オリジナル) is a tag used to define works that are done, and created originally without taking any derivative elements from any existing works."

    The opposite of Pixiv's "Original" tag would basically be the "derivative work" tag here. I used to upload my own art to Pixiv and it was required to choose this for anything that wasn't photo-referenced, a variation on someone else's work, etc.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    honey.badger said:

    This is false. It has nothing to do with copyrights on Pixiv:

    "Original (オリジナル) is a tag used to define works that are done, and created originally without taking any derivative elements from any existing works."

    The opposite of Pixiv's "Original" tag would basically be the "derivative work" tag here. I used to upload my own art to Pixiv and it was required to choose this for anything that wasn't photo-referenced, a variation on someone else's work, etc.

    The unabashed confidence of someone with no idea what they're talking about.

    Original's Pixipedia said:

    Original (オリジナル, orijinaru) as a tag is for illustrations with content that is entirely created by the artist; specifically not related to any established fictional or non-fictional content.

    Do not use this tag for any sort of derivative works. Fanart, parody art, and fan characters related to an established franchise (e.g. Sonic the Hedgehog, Harry Potter, Pokémon, etc. fan characters) should NOT have this tag. In any of the above instances, use the tag related to the franchise in question so as to help better group the image with related fan works.

    Original is 100% a copyright tag. It's the difference between fanart and original creations. Maybe don't stop at the very first line, which you misinterpreted, if you're gonna quote something.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • Show 1 more comment
    Show 7 more comments
    [hidden]

    Akitsukii said:

    The artist's enthusiasm isn't in doubt, but why go to the trouble of making this short clip, when this exactly is already in the anime with a much higher quality?

    If the artist enjoys the pairing and wants to draw it, I think they should draw it. I personally welcome the fan content, and I don't think the series existing should make people not make fan content.

  • 8
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Akitsukii said:

    The artist's enthusiasm isn't in doubt, but why go to the trouble of making this short clip, when this exactly is already in the anime with a much higher quality?

    are you asking why one would draw a person when you can just take a picture?

  • 2
  • Reply
  • 1 2 3 4 5